On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:45:16 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is not the same as adding a new driver or supporting a new SoC. > > The consequences have considerable broader reach. Time must be > > allowed for us to mull over the design. > > > > Merging for 2.6.28 is too aggressive. > > > > I appreciate that you're frustrated with the lack of alternate > > proposals, but there hasn't been enough time yet. > > I understand the short window, but if there isn't useful feedback what > is one to do? Just saying I don't like your solution and leaving at > this isn't productive. I'm all for getting this done right, but we > need constructive feedback. > > There are clearly some high level differences of opinions. The only > way I see of addressing those is by who is putting up code to address
And therein lies the rub. A simple posting of grammar and syntax proposals before the code was written would have probably led to better discussion and less time wasted. I'm all for seeing alternate proposals. I just don't think they need code implementation backing them to start with. josh _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
