On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:50 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:45:16 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is not the same as adding a new driver or supporting a new SoC.
The consequences have considerable broader reach. Time must be
allowed for us to mull over the design.
Merging for 2.6.28 is too aggressive.
I appreciate that you're frustrated with the lack of alternate
proposals, but there hasn't been enough time yet.
I understand the short window, but if there isn't useful feedback
what
is one to do? Just saying I don't like your solution and leaving at
this isn't productive. I'm all for getting this done right, but we
need constructive feedback.
There are clearly some high level differences of opinions. The only
way I see of addressing those is by who is putting up code to address
And therein lies the rub.
A simple posting of grammar and syntax proposals before the code was
written would have probably led to better discussion and less time
wasted. I'm all for seeing alternate proposals. I just don't think
they need code implementation backing them to start with.
I agree completely.. because if someone at least has a proposal than
we have something that can be worked on.
- k
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
