Matt Sealey wrote:
Maintaining them as text for the development process is good but they need to be *published* as the ePAPR binding is *published*, so that you can say.. "hey, this is a canonical reference on a dead tree, my platform confirms to the ePAPR MPC5200B device tree binding V1.0 that I ordered from the Freescale website", instead of "my platform conforms to git commit fab927fe363ac2a872bb872"
The latter is actually much less subject to change... :-) -Scott _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
