On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:39 -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > I guess we would need to decide how those documents are published > without using proprietary software, then, and easily committed to > another git repository (or the same one just in a published form). > I don't suppose office xml is a good choice? It should be flexible > enough and similar enough that sections and layout do not change a > great deal, and git can easily produce diffs?
I would suggest using DocBook if publishing PDFs is a goal. It would also let you output text and HTML as an added bonus. -- Nate Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
