Hello,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:59:50PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:51:33AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > There are already patches floating around to add
> > > energymicro,efm32-{i2c,serial,spi} as compatible strings.
> >
> > "Patches floating around" is not a very convincing argument why
> > "silabs" should not just be used instead. I have no problem taking
> > this, but if changing to silabs is possible, we may want to do that.
> I think energymicro is still the right prefix, because back when efm32
> was created it was still Energy Micro. Or am I wrong here?
Some of these patches entered next in the meantime, affected are:
1b5b23718b84 i2c: efm32: new bus driver
12f6dd860cf8 spi: efm32: use $vendor,$device scheme for compatible
string
A third patch is in gregkh's queue, Subject: "[PATCH] serial: efm32: use
$vendor,$device scheme for compatible string", Message-Id:
[email protected] .
(Wolfram, I just noticed that I failed to fix the binding docs for the
changed compatible string. Should I send a fixup or a v5?)
If I should better use "silabs,..." instead of "energymicro,..." I'd
like to have that sorted out before 3.15-rc1.
Thoughts?
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
