On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:59:50PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:51:33AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Uwe Kleine-König >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > There are already patches floating around to add >> > > energymicro,efm32-{i2c,serial,spi} as compatible strings. >> > >> > "Patches floating around" is not a very convincing argument why >> > "silabs" should not just be used instead. I have no problem taking >> > this, but if changing to silabs is possible, we may want to do that. >> I think energymicro is still the right prefix, because back when efm32 >> was created it was still Energy Micro. Or am I wrong here? > Some of these patches entered next in the meantime, affected are: > > 1b5b23718b84 i2c: efm32: new bus driver > 12f6dd860cf8 spi: efm32: use $vendor,$device scheme for compatible > string > > A third patch is in gregkh's queue, Subject: "[PATCH] serial: efm32: use > $vendor,$device scheme for compatible string", Message-Id: > [email protected] . > > (Wolfram, I just noticed that I failed to fix the binding docs for the > changed compatible string. Should I send a fixup or a v5?) > > If I should better use "silabs,..." instead of "energymicro,..." I'd > like to have that sorted out before 3.15-rc1. > > Thoughts?
Okay, energymicro is fine. Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
