Hello,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:01:16PM +0900, Jaedon Shin wrote:
> +static void brcm_sata_quirks(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv)
> +{
> + if (priv->quirks & BRCM_AHCI_QUIRK_NONCQ) {
> + void __iomem *ctrl = priv->top_ctrl + SATA_TOP_CTRL_BUS_CTRL;
> + void __iomem *ahci;
> + struct resource *res;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> + "ahci");
> + ahci = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(ahci))
> + return;
> +
> + reg = brcm_sata_readreg(ctrl);
> + reg |= OVERRIDE_HWINIT;
> + brcm_sata_writereg(reg, ctrl);
> +
> + /* Clear out the NCQ bit so the AHCI driver will not issue
> + * FPDMA/NCQ commands.
> + */
> + reg = readl(ahci + HOST_CAP);
> + reg &= ~HOST_CAP_NCQ;
> + writel(reg, ahci + HOST_CAP);
> +
> + reg = brcm_sata_readreg(ctrl);
> + reg &= ~OVERRIDE_HWINIT;
> + brcm_sata_writereg(reg, ctrl);
> +
> + devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, ahci);
> + devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> + resource_size(res));
> + }
> +}
Does the controller actually need HOST_CAP_NCQ bit turned off to work
correctly? If the only thing necessary is the host not issuing NCQ
commands, setting AHCI_HFLAG_NO_NCQ should do.
> static void brcm_sata_init(struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv)
> {
> /* Configure endianness */
> @@ -256,6 +297,11 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(priv->top_ctrl))
> return PTR_ERR(priv->top_ctrl);
>
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "brcm,bcm7425-ahci"))
> + priv->quirks |= BRCM_AHCI_QUIRK_NONCQ;
> +
> + brcm_sata_quirks(pdev, priv);
What's the point of "branch - set a bit - test the bit" sequence?
Just do
if (of_device_is_compatiable(...))
brcm_ahci_disable_ncq(...);
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
