Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2015, 11:38 +0100 schrieb Steffen Trumtrar:
> Add the binding documentation for the Epson RX6110 RTC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <[email protected]>
> ---
> I'm not sure what the current policy for such simple SPI bindings is.
> Are they necessary?
Like for i2c there is trivial-devices.txt? Although in this case it's
not just a compatible. Here you have a certain spi configuration that is
necessary for the rtc to work.
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rtc-rx6110.txt | 25
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rtc-rx6110.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rtc-rx6110.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rtc-rx6110.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7ce7ae761657
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rtc-rx6110.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +Epson RX6110 Real Time Clock
> +============================
> +
> +The Epson RX6110 can be used with SPI or I2C busses. The kind of
> +bus depends on the SPISEL pin and can not be configured via software.
> +
> +SPI mode
> +--------
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be: "epson,rtc-rx6110"
Should this just be "epson,rx6110" ?
> +- reg: chip select number
> +- spi-cs-high: RX6110 needs chipselect high
> +- spi-cpha: RX6110 works with SPI shifted clock phase
> +- spi-cpol: RX6110 works with SPI inverse clock polarity
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + rtc: rtc@3 {
> + compatible = "epson,rtc-rx6110"
> + reg = <3>
> + spi-cs-high;
> + spi-cpba;
s/b/h/
> + spi-cpol;
> + };
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
