Tested Michael Weinberger's theory with the following results:
This is the route command output from a working 4.1b3 installation.
[root@mfsi1147 /root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
10.13.1.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 10.13.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
[root@mfsi1147 /root]#
This is the route command output from the non-working 4.1rc1 installation.
[root@ibmpc750 /root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
10.13.1.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
207.68.52.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default * 0.0.0.0
[root@ibmpc750 /root]#
The system also still starts the pppoe service after being reconfigured as a
server only.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Weinberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:38 AM
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] RC1 PPPoE issues
> 1) when configured as "Server And Gateway" with PPPoE,
> the default route still is wrong
> now 0.0.0.0 on eth1, was 192.168.65.1 on eth1 with beta4
> Is this the problem addressed by Jack McCauley?
>
> 2) after configuration is altered from "Server and
> Gateway" with PPPoE to "Server only" the pppoe service
> still comes up.
>
> Michael
>
> --
> This list is archived
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
