Dan, > Just a quick question--is the "new" IP format supported? That is, > instead of feeding it 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0, can I feed it > 192.168.100.0/24? That just seems cleaner.
Funny you should ask... Charlie suggested that I should make a note that CIDR notation was supported... my response was that I wanted to keep the document simple, so I didn't. And one of the first questions is.... So yes, it *is* supported. (And I just added a note to that effect in a version that I uploaded now. :-) Regards, Dan -- Dan York, Director of Training, Network Server Solutions Group Mitel Networks Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +1-613-751-4401 Cell: +1-613-263-4312 Fax: +1-613-564-7739 150 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1500, Ottawa,ON K2P 1P1 Canada http://www.e-smith.com/ http://www.mitel.com/sme/ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
