Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Why? Samba 2.2.2 is more stable than 2.2.1a as it is 2.2.1a with bug > fixes. For example, there are multiple issues with Samba 2.2.1a and > Win2k SP2 and WinXP that have been resolved in Samba 2.2.2. Like I said Greg, I'm going to take a look at Samba 2.2.2 on my test server. However, I do not rush to new releases with the same enthusiasm others may share. FYI my production server is still happily running e-smith 4.1.2. I'll throw Samba 2.2.2 on my SME5 test server and evaluate it for a while first. I suggest other devinfo members do the same. But I'm not going to give it my thumbs up until I test it and hear reports from other devinfo testers that all is well. If you have Samba 2.2.2 installed and working then let's hear your report. Regards, -- Darrell May DMC Netsourced.com http://netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
