Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Exposure is a bit of an issue as well -- since IMP is one of > the more widely-deployed webmail systems out there, there are a lot > more people eyeballing the code and finding these problems. (This is > an advantage.) Very well stated Rich. All the mainstream apps get heavilly scrutinized. In the end it is a compliment to the wide spread usage. > Speaking of which, I'm very excited about IMP 3.0, which is currently > in the release-candidate stage. It won't be available in time for 5.1, > alas. (There's a demo at <http://www.horde.org/demo/> if you'd > like to poke around.) Hmmmm. Very slow demooooo. I gave up waiting.... :-< If Mitel _is_ expecting to move to IMP 3.0 when ready, would you have anything 'bleeding edge' you could provide the devinfo crowd for testing? (This would of course be under the full acknowledgement that IMP 3.0 is not going to be part of SME5.1) Regards, -- Darrell May DMC Netsourced.com http://netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
