On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:15:12PM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Weinberger wrote:
> 
> > This can result in a confusing behaviour. Example:
> > A mail has been sent to you last week. The mail is stored in Maildir/new.
> > Today you check your mailbox. This mail then is moved to the Maildir/cur.
> > With UW-IMAP, the timestamp will change. If you use a mail client, which use
> > the 'internal date' as the 'arrival date' the message appears as received
> > today.
> 
> I don't understand how the mail client is getting the "internal date" 
> (which is no longer "internal" once it is exported from the IMAP daemon 
> environment). There's obviously something that I don't understand. Is 
> there part of the IMAP protocol which sends this "internal" concept of 
> date to the client? 

IMAP has the Internal Date Message Attribute, which ostensibly tells
you when the message was delivered. A good idea, poorly thought out
and even poorer in implementation, if you will.

It's left entirely up to the IMAP server as to how it wants to
generate an IDMA -- the standard says that it SHOULD (not even MUST!)
be the delivery date and time for messages delivered over SMTP -- and
for that reason it's about as reliable as delivery status
notifications and read receipts, an "only rely on this if you know
everyone involved uses the same software" sort of feature.

  -Rich

-- 
------------------------------ Rich Lafferty ---------------------------
       Technical Support Engineer, Network Server Solutions Group
    Mitel Networks, Ottawa, ON                        (613) 751-4404
---------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ------------------------

--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to