-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> From: Charlie Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> The first is the one available from php.net. The second is one that
> I made to patch a number of remaining boundary checking problems.
> It is a  

        ...and the one from php.net is different for 4.1.x.  Your patch
applies to 4.1.2 without rpm complaining, which I suppose is a good
sign, but can I conclude from that fact that it's reasonably likely
to be safe?

        Or, put differently: do you know of any reason that I shouldn't try
just applying your patch to 4.1.2?  Obviously it wouldn't be
Mitel-supported; I'd just like some indication from somebody who
knows more C, and/or more about the workings of PHP, than I do (which
doesn't take much in either case).

- -- 
Dan Brown, KE6MKS, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Since all the world is but a story, it were well for thee to buy the
more enduring story rather than the story that is less enduring."
 -- The Judgment of St. Colum Cille 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPIgza36CI7gsQbX8EQKrlACbBlxjKa2orXyu4i8z13zLiCfY/LEAn1IB
Lp1PY2gfBR2QXBpRcvif9brV
=7hG7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to