On 1 Nov 2002 at 17:55, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Nick Ramsay wrote: > > > Maybe I'm missing something, maybe there's a Mitel agenda that's > > invisible to me, but it seems to me that Darrell has a valid point > > WRT obtuse-smtpd vs. mailfront. > > You, Darrell and anyone else is entitled to his or her opinion. You are > also welcome to fix any perceived deficiency in the code or in the > product. > > All I ask is that you respect Mitel's right to do what it chooses to do in > the interest of its customers and shareholders. > > Darrell has persistently refused to respect that right despite repeated > pleas. He's the only "them" as far as I'm concerned, and he'll only be > "them" as long as he refuses to co-operate. > Thanks for the clarification, Charlie. If I understand you correctly, your beef is with Darrell in particular, not potential contributors as a whole.
I absolutely agree that Mitel has the right to choose what it does, that is self-evident. As they say, the devil is in the detail & Darrell seems to have focused in on some details which Mitel have deemed unworthy of further effort - so be it. -- Nick Ramsay Witzend Computer Services http://www.witzendcs.co.uk/ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
