Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Yeah, I see why the feature exists, and it's useful -- but I'd still
> have preferred a different directive for sender rules instead of
> making "*" magical. (Having to use "*@*" there is a pretty icky
> kludge. :-)

Further testing has proven '*@*' does not work either :-<  This blocks
sending to undefined external addresses.  The '*' magical implementation is
a pain because it overrides rule order sequence.

However, I believe I have the 'beginnings' of an effective mailrules
implementation for SME5.5/5.6:

http://myezserver.com/downloads/mitel/alpha/mailrules/

As suggested by the location, consider this alpha and highly experimental
for non-production testing only.  I fully expect this may break something so
use at your own risk!  I have tested internal mail and outbound mail
delivery only.  I have NOT tested external inbound mail.

I'm releasing early hoping the devinfo community will take a look and
provide further testing and ideas (or code) for enhancement.

Regards,

--
Darrell May
DMC Netsourced.com
http://myEZserver.com


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to