On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 07:22:21PM -0000, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Yeah, I see why the feature exists, and it's useful -- but I'd still
> > have preferred a different directive for sender rules instead of
> > making "*" magical. (Having to use "*@*" there is a pretty icky
> > kludge. :-)
>
> Further testing has proven '*@*' does not work either :-< This blocks
> sending to undefined external addresses. The '*' magical implementation is
> a pain because it overrides rule order sequence.
Ah, right -- I'd forgotten that mailrules is applied even if an
address is allowed to relay.
-Rich
--
------------------------------ Rich Lafferty ---------------------------
Systems Administrator/Support Engineer, Network Server Solutions Group
Mitel Networks, Ottawa, ON +1 613 592 2122 (x2513)
-------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
