On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 1:44 am, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rasjid Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 8:53 am, Charlie Brady wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Yes, mailfront will be upgraded when SME is upgraded, but if it is
> > > marked as disabled it will stay marked as disabled.
> >
> > I presume the correct way is to disable smtpfront-qmail is
> > # /sbin/e-smith/db configuration setprop smtpfront-qmail status disabled
>
> Correct.
>
> > What is the correct way to enable a new service?
> >
> > My guess is:
> > a) script or link in /etc/init.d/
> > b) link in /etc/rc7.d to /etc/rc.d/init.d/e-smith-service
> >
> > Add a 'newservice=service|status|enabled' line in
> > /home/e-smith/configuration, with
> > # /sbin/e-smith/db configuration set zzzservice service status enabled
>
> Yes, looks right to me.
>
> > I notice that 26 of the service entries have an InitscriptOrder entry,
> > and 22 don't.  Is it best to include one or not??
>
> The depends on what version or versions you are writing to.
>
> InitscriptsOrder is now deprecated, and hasn't been necessary for some
> time. It's implicit in the rc7.d symlink which you create and include in
> the RPM. In earlier versions those symlinks were created during
> post-install and post-upgrade, so the property was needed. Since
> "e-smith-service" was written, we no longer need to add and delete the
> symlinks as services are enabled and disabled, so that the dynamic link
> creation/deletion is no longer required.

Thanks for the feedback Charlie.

I now think my qpsmtpd Howto is SME complient.  Sometime I'll do a trial 
upgrade to 5.6 beta, and know for sure.  :-)

Cheers,

Rasjid.

-- 
Rasjid Wilcox
Canberra, Australia (UTC +10 hrs)
http://www.openminddev.net


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to