On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote: > getting done. Please be assured that 95% of what's being discussed > off-list at this time is organizational in nature (e.g., how are we > going to move the lists, what bug tracking are we going to use, what's > our next move, how are we going to organize the troops, do we use > sourceforge or don't we, etc, etc.)
That's all as may be, Greg, but do remember that I started this thread by quoting Hsing-Foo: > contribs.org is looking in to the most suiteable update mechachinsm. The most suitable update mechanism for end-users is not an organisational issue at all, and I can't understand why "contribs.org" would be looking into it. -- Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ Phone: +1 (613) 592 5660 or 592 2122 Fax: +1 (613) 592 1175 A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text? -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
