On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 17:12, Richard Hughes<hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/2 Kay Sievers <kay.siev...@vrfy.org>: >> Yeah, it's a bit dangerous. > > Yes, I think virtual devices are a quick way back to the HAL mess. > That's why I wanted to merge the data back to where it came from, so > to speak. All it's doing is providing a mapping for one key value to > another, with a DKP_ prefix.
Yeah, and stuffing application specific properties in the udev database isn't exactly nice too. We need to be careful here. >> Yeah, maybe it dies for good with HAL, and we should not pretend to >> know anything like this. Sounds like the best road to take from where >> we are now. > > Then that's a regression. I really don't want to teach > gnome-power-manager about the niceties of dmidecode just so it can > choose the default policy in a sane way. Ok, what is it you need that information for? What relies on these properties? Kay _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
