On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 11:12 -0500, Robby Workman wrote: > > a) use standard configuration systems like e.g. GConf > > > GConf is not "standard" at all.
Hence the term "e.g." - it means "for example". > If the goal is desktop-neutrality > (which it should be, IMHO), then GConf should be out of the equation > completely. If it's optional, that's fine, but *requiring* it is just > wrong IMO. No, it is not a goal for policy agents like gnome-power-manager to be desktop neutral - in fact, it's an anti-goal. (Of course I wasn't suggesting devkit-power should be using GConf - I mean, that thing should not be involved in policy _at all_ so the point is totally moot.) David _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel