On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:15:41 -0400 David Zeuthen <da...@fubar.dk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 11:12 -0500, Robby Workman wrote: > > > a) use standard configuration systems like e.g. GConf > > > > > > GConf is not "standard" at all. > > Hence the term "e.g." - it means "for example". > > > If the goal is desktop-neutrality > > (which it should be, IMHO), then GConf should be out of the equation > > completely. If it's optional, that's fine, but *requiring* it is > > just wrong IMO. > > No, it is not a goal for policy agents like gnome-power-manager to be > desktop neutral - in fact, it's an anti-goal. > > (Of course I wasn't suggesting devkit-power should be using GConf - I > mean, that thing should not be involved in policy _at all_ so the > point is totally moot.) Ah, apologies for my misunderstanding - I was under the impression that this was intended for devkit-power as opposed to g-p-m; going back and re-reading the earlier mails makes it clear. Mea culpa :/ -RW
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
