On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:15:52PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote: > Are you concerned that the future of Freenet might be jeapordized > by people (mistakenly or otherwise) associating it with pornography? > I imagine the content seen on Freenet accurately reflects the > interests of its users. Should we be ashamed of ourselves? :-) No. I think that if people want certain information, then they should be able to get it, and if they don't want certain information, then it shouldn't be imposed on them. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- RE: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul W. Eric C. Ferguson
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Michael Carmack
PGP signature