> This is pseudo-lawyering, which is dangerous. As has been demonstrated > with Napster (who didn't filter anything), whether you currently filter > something or not, if it is on the WWW, you can be shut down. This is U.S. legal precedent. Napster was shut down because it was deemed a technology specifically designed for copyright infringement without substantial non-infringing uses. Search engines, on the other hand, have historically been okay unless they censored some content, in which they were deemed to be taking responsibility for the non-filtered content. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- RE: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul W. Eric C. Ferguson
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Owen Williams
- Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul Ian Clarke
