> This is pseudo-lawyering, which is dangerous.  As has been demonstrated
> with Napster (who didn't filter anything), whether you currently filter
> something or not, if it is on the WWW, you can be shut down.

This is U.S. legal precedent. Napster was shut down because it was deemed
a technology specifically designed for copyright infringement without
substantial non-infringing uses.

Search engines, on the other hand, have historically been okay unless they
censored some content, in which they were deemed to be taking
responsibility for the non-filtered content.



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to