Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better.

[Ian Clarke]

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:42:18PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote:
> I'm personally developing a couple of projects around the Freenet
> base. It's not so attractive when my imports look like:
> 
> import java.io.*;
> import java.util.*;
> import Freenet.contrib.*;
> 
> Why does the concept of using Freenet as a module within other
> projects strike you as peculiar? Certainly you don't think 
> everyone in the world is going to be content with the default
> functionality, do you? This is a powerful tool you guys are 
> creating; there's a lot that can be done with it by using it
> as a piece in other puzzles.

I am not opposed to migrating to a "org.freenetproject.fred" project,
and in the process moving Freenet.contrib to
"org.freenetproject.contrib" and tidying some stuff up.  The reason we
didn't do this to begin with is because we didn't have a sensible domain
name, but we do now.

*However*, I think that this should wait until 0.4.

Ian.

PGP signature