> When viewed in the context of most other well-written Java packages, > Freenet is certainly the oddball. We have a consolidated Javadoc tree > available at http://ariel.w3.org/javadoc/ in which this is clearly > visible. It's not particularly attractive for developers working > with Freenet as a modular rather than a monolithic entity. Is there someone in the universe using Freenet as a module rather than a monolithic entity? I'd be interested in hearing about this. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. burtonator
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... david
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... burtonator
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized bet... Steven Hazel
