> > But then it wouldn't stop mechanical spam. > > True. It has to be combined with the credit scheme or a time based scheme > to allow the recipient to renew or cancel a sequence. The two best ways, I think, are to either have a whitelist (moderated subscription) or think cash on every post. Everything else is just adding complicated for no clear big win. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Ian Clarke
