On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:46:23AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > The way to filter a whitelist is to subscribe by sending your public key > and some kind of credentials (not think cash) and then filter messages > which are not signed by a known public key. Filtering really isn't good enough. Though the message never gets through you can still do a DOS attack. Why not run the key through some sort of random number generator that can be guaranteed not to have collisions or something and send the data to keys created from that RNG? You can reseed the RNG periodicly to reduce collisions. -- GCS d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++ P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://retep.tripod.com
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Mark J. Roberts
PGP signature