On Fri, 4 May 2001, Oskar Sandberg wrote:

> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:16:58AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 03:59:56PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> < > 
> > > Maybe we should use byte 21 after all. Only make it the log of the total
> > > size of the document instead - that way you would know for sure before
> > > requesting something.
> > 
> > Good idea.  I'll plan on doing that.  We can also use that to enforce the
> > power of 2 filesize requirement.
> 
> In which case one could question whether we need a DataLength field. It is
> a orthogonality verses layering issue, though in this case I think
> layering wins out...
> 

Doesn't power of 2 data sizes waste 25% of bandwidth & storage?  That's
costly.


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to