On Sun, 6 May 2001, Adam Langley wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Steven is right about this, the extra hash is simply unnecessary. > > make_key(data + padding) is fine. > > It doesn't really matter and it makes the code simpler with the extra hash. Exactly. Otherwise you have to have a brand new make_key algorithm for working with large streams of data. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
