On Fri, 25 May 2001, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 07:43:06PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Unless Tavin pulled off a miracle, it's still missing several necessary
> > parts.
>
> This is what's left in the TODO -- anything else?
>
> + Fix announcement spec with simpler protocol
> + Spec load balancing through dynamic DataSource reseting
> + Total bandwidth cap for day/week/month/year settings
> + Implement simpler announcement protocol
> + Implement load balancing (possibly not in first release)
> + Implement ARKs (possibly not in first release)
> + finish AutoClient, metadata handling
> + make reference clients use AutoClient
> + rewrite fproxy against new plug-in model, use AutoClient
> + selective caching (protocol-side) (maybe not in first release)
> + selective/non-caching of local activities (inserts only?) (maybe not in first
>release)
> + revision of datastore internals to handle DFS buckets
>
> (and of course, FNP is totally untested atm)
>
I have a bad feeling I'm about to be volunteered for this job, but one
thing I think freenet should have is a set of regression tests.
Specifically on various aspects of the protocol, but possibly for other
internal components as well. it's nearly useless doing this kind of
thing for 0.3.x, but if we're eventually going to commit to freezing the
protocol at this version (or at least keeping backwards compatibility,
it'll be good to be able to test if we're breaking anything.)
Thelema
--
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you love something, set it free.
GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D
PGP signature
