On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget
> the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if
> someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free?
> The best way to prevent this is to encourage people to hand around CHKs
> and SSKs.
Well an attack aganst www.slashdot.free is very unlikely to work
globally. My KSK-replacement has mostly failed on the popular
test.html, only the almost totally unrequested test.jpg worked.
However I still go with your view %100; having spoofing possible at
all is unacceptible.
--
Need some Linux help or custom C(++) programming? Drop me a line and
I'll see what I can do. Resume at http://retep.tripod.com/resume.html
GCS d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++ P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M
V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.petertodd.ca
PGP signature
