On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:34:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget
> > the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if
> > someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free?
> > The best way to prevent this is to encourage people to hand around CHKs
> > and SSKs.
>
> Well an attack aganst www.slashdot.free is very unlikely to work
> globally. My KSK-replacement has mostly failed on the popular
> test.html, only the almost totally unrequested test.jpg worked.
>
> However I still go with your view %100; having spoofing possible at
> all is unacceptible.
Actually with new nodes, I often get the spoofed "test" file - which has got to
have been one of the most popuar requests. I have also reached your "test.html"
file on more than one occasion.
PGP signature
