On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 02:08:44AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > Freenet doesn't have to do _everything_ .. Let Freenet excel at being > one thing: a decentralized, quasi-anonymous, efficient system for inserting > and retrieving data by key. Then create another system -- a decentralized, > quasi-anonymous metadata search network. Let each network become optimized > to perform its specific purpose. Whether the two are both considered "Freenet" or whether the other network has a different name is just semantics. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fu... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fu... Oskar Sandberg
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Oskar Sandberg