Hi Stefan, > > The fix for this is trivial, and will be left as an exercise for the > reader. > > :-) > > Reader stupid - author explain! The solution is to limit the percentage of the datastore that can be affected by reads, as explained further in my reply to Ian on the "Another possible bug" thread. Essentially you have two datastores, one for caching. I can't get anyone to comment on this proposal though. :-( Oh well. Cya, Ray _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Ray Heasman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Ray Heasman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Ray Heasman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Stefan Reich
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy??? Frank Joppe
