On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:04:41PM +0200, Stefan Reich wrote:
> From: "Ray Heasman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The solution is to limit the percentage of the datastore that can be
> > affected by reads, as explained further in my reply to Ian on the "Another
> > possible bug" thread. Essentially you have two datastores, one for
> caching.
>
> Ok, I see.
>
> With your scheme, I see a problem with anonymity of inserts though. If
> something is inserted with HTL n, it will end up in the non-caching part of
> exactly n datastores, right?
I don't know. I'll have to scratch my head for a bit and consult
documentation.
>
> This makes it a lot easier to find out who the original inserter was. If you
> can see inside one node that received the file during insertion, it is
> probably possible to find out all or most of the other nodes involved.
Um. I'm not sure I agree. You change where data goes in tha cache, that's
all. How, exactly?
> > I can't get anyone to comment on this proposal though. :-(
>
> I just did ;-)
And it is greatly appreciated. :-)
Cya,
Ray
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
