> Where are you getting the idea that whatever observed slowness is due to
> fproxy being written in Java?
> Competition is always good. But I don't think the speed boost you're
> assuming you'll obtain is really there..
On my system, FProxy can't stream MP3s.
FwProxy (written in C) streams them beautifully.
QED.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tavin Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 19:28
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed!
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:53:07PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > Seriously though - I'll have a look, but I'm a bit sceptical about the
> > feasibility ot getting the required speed in a Java FProxy
implementation.
> > Maybe some hard-assed coding decisions might result in being able to
stream
> > MP3s (on a fine day, with the tongue angled 15 degress upward out the
left
> > of the mouth, and no other processes running), but then again, maybe
not. As
> > for MPEG streaming, I don't hold much hope.
>
> Where are you getting the idea that whatever observed slowness is due to
> fproxy being written in Java? My suspects are 1) slow network and
> 2) the fact that currently fproxy, even though it runs in the node,
> makes an FNP connection to the node to do requests.
>
> > Again, I propose, what do people think of a portable C (yeh - straight
C)
> > FProxy implementation?
>
> Competition is always good. But I don't think the speed boost you're
> assuming you'll obtain is really there..
>
> --
>
> # tavin cole
> #
> # "Technology is a way of organizing the universe so that
> # man doesn't have to experience it."
> #
> # - Max Frisch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
