On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:31:21PM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >For example:
> >SSK@blahblahblah/sitename - legal
> >SSK@blahblahblah/sitename/containing/slashes - illegal
> >
> >that way, MSK@SSK@ URIs would be expressible with a single slash, for
> >example,
> >MSK@SSK@blahblahblah/sitename/index.html
>
> This isn't going to be compatible with 0.4 style MSKs, which don't use the MSK
> keyword, and the "//" is how the client tells a MSK from any other key.
A while ago I proposed letting the document name be given at the end of the SSK
like this:
SSK@blah[,cryptokey],sitename/mapfilename
Nobody liked it.
--
: it's time we took labor saving away from machines :
: and gave it back to the people... :
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
