Originally the idea was to force third party implementers to implement both Rijndael and Twofish because we werent sure which would become AES. Its still wise to implement with Cipher agnosticity, but its less of an issue.
> I never saw the point of using a different cipher for data encryption > then we do elsewhere. Rijndael is AES, Twofish will continue to grow > more obscure. > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 02:10:31AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > Hi Oskar: > > > > I noticed that AutoRequester uses Rijndael for inserting. Is > > this correct? I thought Twofish was used for document encryption. > > > > -- gj > > > > --- snippet from AutoRequester.doPut > > > > return > > executeProcess(new PutRequestProcess(key, htl, "Rijndael", > > metadata, data, > > new FileBucketFactory(), > > 0, true)); > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Freesites > > (0.3) freenet:MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// > > (0.4) freenet:SSK@npfV5XQijFkF6sXZvuO0o~kG4wEPAgM/homepage// > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- > > Oskar Sandberg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl -- retry cog molest girl
msg02970/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
