Yeah, we probably can. > > Well, Fred still has support for both, it was just a question of > default. I do think we can deprecate Twofish now though. > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 07:48:26AM -0700, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > Originally the idea was to force third party implementers to implement > > both Rijndael and Twofish because we werent sure which would become > > AES. Its still wise to implement with Cipher agnosticity, but its less of > > an issue. > > > > > I never saw the point of using a different cipher for data encryption > > > then we do elsewhere. Rijndael is AES, Twofish will continue to grow > > > more obscure. > > > -- > > Oskar Sandberg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- grocer melt gyro list
msg02975/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
