> > And lastly, don't you know enough CVS to check out older versions of > > files? If not, be like me and use emacs, which'll do all the CVS > > stuff for you. (at least under linux, there's probably a way under > > windows) > > Sure, I could check out older versions of the WinInstaller, but as I > feel responsible for maintaining and creating the *new* Windows > distributions, I should better be able to build it myself, shouldn't I? > And I am not going to upgrade my OS, just in order to build the > Installer prog. If I want an server OS, I use Linux.
Somebody somewhere has missed the point. You don't need to upgrade the OS to build the Installer - that would be INSANE. You need to upgrade your *header files*. Hell, we could even include the appropriate header file in cvs (I'm sure Microsoft wouldn't mind). Or, as I said (some time ago) in a previous email, somebody can put the BELOW_NORMAL_PRIORITY and ABOVE_NORMAL_PRIORITY #defines in (preferably in a separate .h file, not in the source .cpp, and #include it) and it will compile fine that way. I'm not going to do it myself, because I've done nothing wrong, and I have better things to do than argue the relative merits of Microsoft OSs and whether or not to download the latest header files and whether or not this makes program development more difficult. Come on people. d _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
