On Wednesday 12 June 2002 15:09, you wrote:

I doubt you are messing up freenet more than anyone else running the 467 or 
earlier builds ;-)

The problem is that it is a change which will only have an effect once a 
substantial number of nodes are running the new code.   I don't think we are 
seeing any real freenet routing at all.  At some point we should probably do 
a mandatory upgrade.   I picked 10 because it seemed like a reasonable 
number.  Maybe it should be a little higher, but probably not much.   I doubt 
the routing will ever emerge if every node routes every request out to the 
50th best noderef...


468 does seem to be an improvement.  My node is actually moving data for the 
first time in weeks.

-- gj

> Switching default maxRoutingSteps from 100 down to 10 seems to me to
> have been too drastic a change.  Perhaps changing it to 50 or 30 would
> have been a better idea.  As it is, all my node gives me now are "Route
> Not Found" errors, unless I've got the data and route it locally.  I
> know at least one freenet user who has gone back to using build 464
> (with transient=true), so there are probably others.
>
> I run a non-transient Win98 node via DSL, tunneling through my firewall,
> with about 900 MB datastore, build 468, with maxRoutingSteps set to a
> more reasonable 30 (until more nodes upgrade, when I plan to decrease it
> slowly down to 10).  Bandwidth throttles set to in=100000 out=10000.
> Max connections 40.  doAnnounce=true.  watchme=false.
>
> seednodes file: contains one ref to hawk.
> uptime: 3 hours 45 min
> Current reqs/hour: 2264
> routing keys: 535
> datastore keys: 3233
> inbound request keys: 8589
>
> Am I screwing up the rest of freenet by doing this?  Maybe.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

-- 
Freesite
(0.4) freenet:SSK@npfV5XQijFkF6sXZvuO0o~kG4wEPAgM/homepage//

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to