On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Gianni Johansson wrote: > The problem is that it is a change which will only have an effect once a > substantial number of nodes are running the new code. I don't think we are > seeing any real freenet routing at all. At some point we should probably do > a mandatory upgrade. I picked 10 because it seemed like a reasonable
If you're doing another mandatory upgrade, please try to inform non-transient node runners beforehand so the core nodes get upgraded as soon as possible. The last mandatory upgrade more or less wrecked the network. Gathering a new set of working seednodes wouldn't hurt either. > 468 does seem to be an improvement. My node is actually moving data for the > first time in weeks. Yeah, I've noticed the same thing too. Maybe it's just that freesite authors are re-inserting their sites, but my node is successfully retrieving several of the old edition freesites and even a few of active dbr sites (Pussy Galore, Phil Marlowe) and sometimes even Vrakkar and CofE. The large number of RouteNotFound's are making inserting stuff a pain, though. -- Mika Hirvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
