...
=2E..ok, I am only kidding - but now that the datastore has been replaced,= >=20 >hopefully it will soon be stable (Matthew is fixing a bug a minute by the l= >ooks=20 >of it) - the last remaining excuse for not releasing the laughably overdue = >0.5=20 >are no longer valid. > >So, if you think you have a really good reason why we shouldn't bump the=20 >version to 0.5 when the native datastore has proven itself, speak now or=20 >forever hold your peace. Just this; is fproxy usable via SSL tunnel ? This is probably trivial from a software point of view, but mandatory from an application security point of view. If we are concerned about people using IE to browse Freenet with fproxy, we must have a bigger concern for people doing it using http and not https. Maybe a good idea will be put the same kind of warning message when fproxy is used via http. This is the only doubt I have; I'll not have time to check this myself until next week. JM2C Marco -- * Marco A. Calamari [EMAIL PROTECTED] * il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
