Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Eh? People will run a node locally. If they don't run a permanent node > locally they have no security anyway. So what's the point of SSL?
This is so *very* short-sighted. At work, for example, my web browser is on HP-UX 10.20 and my node is on Win95. You don't actually expect me to try to run a Freenet node on HP-UX 10.20 do you? Good lord, I can't even get one stable on OpenBSD. Now, if freenet were written in a *portable* language instead of a proprietary one.... ;-) But I don't think it's freenet's job to implement any sort of tunnel for extra security; simply make sure that freenet doesn't actively prevent people from doing that sort of tunneling (e.g. by doing silly HTTP redirection tricks). -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ |
msg04115/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
