There was much stink raised over agressive bumping up of the last build
that would be listened to by the network way back when to the point that
the developers seem to be quite adverse to doing so anymore (eventhough
you hear murmurings once in a while that we should do it coupled with an
undertone of dread of being the person to suffer the wraith that that
entails). I would like to offer an idea that might give both developers
and users a happy middle ground.
Is it not possible to just set the "last good build" (whatever the
variables are actually called is unknown to me) to (current_build - n)?
n is some "build-lag" that allows users some break from the upgrade
treadmill yet is enough to prod them along so that developers get some
feel on the network performance effect of their latest and greatest
improvements. I would suggest a number like 10.
If the developers feel that the latest thing that they have done fixes
some terribly hideous flaw in former builds then they can bump up the
current_build number by more then 1 (but < 10) but should do so only for
good reason. Otherwise there will be screams from the users to boost n
and we are back to square one.
This policy can be advertised everywhere so that it is no surprise when
someone's node falls off the edge of the network. It also absolves the
developers of the resposibility of having to continuously update the
webpage and make announcements everytime there is a significant change
encouraging eveyone to update.
I think that this will be acceptable from both sides. I believe most
users understand the need to keep up to date on a system in development
but just don't want the rug pulled out from beneath their feet suddenly.
On the flip side, I believe most developers understand that not all
users want to do daily upgrades yet they also want to prod them along a
little bit to get some real feedback on changes that they've made.
Mike
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-dev] Last good build Michael Wiktowy
- [freenet-dev] Last good build Pascal
- Re: [freenet-dev] Last good build J
- Re: [freenet-dev] Last good build Benny Amorsen
- Re: [freenet-dev] Last good build bolas
- Re: [freenet-dev] Last good build Benny Amorsen
- Re: [freenet-dev] Last good build Dan Merillat
- Re: [freenet-dev] Last good build J
