Quoting Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2003-10-15 at 16:20, J wrote: > > Quoting Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> Perhaps we need to send a "do not try me again until you restart" > >> message instead. Leaving the newer node in the routing table but not > >> trying it again until the old node has restarted (hopefully having > >> upgraded). > > > > Sounds very easy to exploit. > > How so? Either the too-old node listens to the message and stops > sending, which is good, or it fails to listen to the message, which is > the same behaviour we have today.
Yeah, thinking about it some more, that doesn't seem worse than what we have now. But another thought, (enter my freenet protocol ignorance here), is it impossible for a node to impersonate another? I would assume this possibilty is covered by the node to node encryption? j. > > > /Benny > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
