On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> > > undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
> >
> > I agree - that is what plugin architectures are for.
> What do you mean?
> 
> When you add a servlet to the mainport configuration setting you are running 
> it in fred's JVM.  
> Where else are people plugging things in?

Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM 
by default.  Surely it is better to have one instance of the JVM 
running, rather than two?

> > Increasingly, streaming protocols operate over TCP - what QOS guarantee
> > does TCP offer? 
> At least the lower bounds can be charcterized.  Perhaps you could help do the 
> same for freenet.  See below.

There is a big difference between a QOS guarantee and a 
"characterization" of throughput ;-)   I think that we should be able to 
experiment a-bit and figure out what kind of throughput Freenet can 
achieve.

> >  Such streaming protocols address this using buffering,
> > there is no reason why we can't do the same.
> The latencies in Freenet are orders of magnitude larger.

If this is true, then the solution is to make the buffers larger in
accordance with the higher latencies.  A buffer of 1-2 minutes would not
be unreasonable.

> I would be interested in a principled analysis of what it would take to make 
> this really work.  How much buffering?  What minimum average rate?

Well, IIRC FM quality audio requires 64kbits/sec, or 8kbytes/sec with
ogg.  At 4k/sec we can still achieve recognizable transmission of 
speech.  I would be surprised if Freenet couldn't achieve an average 
throughput of 8kbytes/sec.

> I don't think I could stop fish if I wanted to, which I don't.  Pointing out 
> that the Freenet architecture provides no QOS, is not what I would 
> characterize as discouragement.  It's more like technical due diligence.

Well, in fairness you did more than point that out, you implied that 
streaming was impossible.

> > Splitfiles I have been seeing overall download rates of around 30k/sec,
> > which is more than enough for a FM quality ogg stream.
> Which SplitFiles?  What tests have you run?

Very basic, downloaded an episode of ST Enterprise, did the math.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke                ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project                                          http://locut.us/
Personal Homepage                                   http://locut.us/ian/

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to