> > > You don't want fred to have to compete with code that is running > > > continuous FEC decoding in the same JVM. Perhaps your machine is so > > > powerful that you haven't noticed, but we can't get fred to run with > > > reasonable CPU usage *all by itself*. > If you really care so passionately about "streaming", what about doing some > work to figure out what's going on with CPU usage?
??? Stop trying to change the subject. > I don't appreciate your tone and ad hominum attacks. Ad hominum? Give me one example of where I made an ad hominum attack. And my "tone" is no different to yours. > I have limited time to devote to this project and the amount that I would > waste engaging in this kind of debate is directly subtracted from it. Noted. Nobody please disagree with GJ from now on since unlike anyone else on this project, he is a busy person and doesn't have time to justify his claims. > All I meant is that when the FCP server is overwhelmed, it can stop answering > requests. The bottleneck is much more likely to be the connection to the Internet than the FCP connection over the local loopback. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
msg06409/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
