On Friday 13 June 2003 10:22 pm, fish wrote: > I just don't think that they should be >1meg,
Uh, just to clarify you mean >1meg right? I agree with you. It doesn't seem to me that there are many nodes accepting blocks >1meg anyway. If you are combinning it into a container only to break it up into chunks I don't see the gain. However this could be implemented at the application level by combining all the SMALL images (aside from the sites thumbnail) into one file. But leave the HTML alone this way each page is still independently referenceable and unnecessary redundancy is eliminated. A trick that might be nice would be to to try to get all the small images to combine to a nice even size. That way you pad less. Also, your comment about size and low bandwith users got me thinking: Is their some way to have nodes bias the size of the data they store biased on their available banwidth. And if so how could routing, load distribution, and utilization of low bandwith nodes be improved biased on this? Anyway that is the start of a whole new thread, so I'll post it to tech@ once I think it through a little more. _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
